Here's what I have strategized during this horrible bear market.
1. Console myself that STI annual returns was about 8-9% throughout the past 28 years.
Here's the chart:
From year 1987 to Aug 2015 now, the returns was 265.62%, over 28 years annualize as 9.48%.
STI has fluctuated many many times but the general trend is upward. One should treat stock investments as a long term serious commitment, and have the patience to ride out the rocky waves from time to time. My investment horizon is 10 years at least, not 10 months or 10 days.
This brings out to my next point:
2. Be patient, hold my stocks.
I read somewhere about the psychology of most investors and why majority lose money in stocks. Credits to the rightful owner of this picture (which I do not have the source).
Are you selling your stocks now? are you selling it at a loss?
Why are you selling it at a loss when you should be selling it at a profit?
Is it because your stocks are junk? wait, if you stocks are junk, why have you bought them??
This brings about to the next point again.
3. Look at the fundamentals
Although one should treat investment as a long term horizon, it is also very important to look at the financial statements of the company periodically. I have great interest and excitement whenever I look at the company's financials!
Is the company doing reasonably well and having a decent growth rate? how is the industry doing? how is the management? what have they conveyed as their growth strategies?
If the company does not seem to be doing well either because the company is lacking in groove, lacking in management leadership or generally because the industry has slowed down and show no signs of improving, then yes, it is time to cut your losses.
Other than that, if the company has strong fundamentals, it is best to HOLD and not sell at FEAR. pls omg.
4. Dollar cost averaging
'Dollar cost averaging' is an investment term used to describe the purchase of unit trusts. However, the principle can be applied when buying stocks.
It generally means that one can buy stocks gradually, inching bit by bit when stock prices changes.
Meaning:
500 lots at STI ETF $3.02
500 lots at STI ETF $2.80 ( if it really goes this low)
and then buy again when it drops further till when it finally starts going up.
This will mitigate the loss as the stock price is averaged out. Eventually (perhaps years later) when the stocks go up again, that's where the profits can be seen.
That being said, I am going to buy STI. I do have other blue chip stocks in mind that I think are really undervalued but I will not be sharing it here.
Till then, I will also not be logging into POEMS to check my portfolio. x.x
Whenever you are spending money, think of the ways you can generate income instead.
Thursday, 20 August 2015
Sunday, 2 August 2015
My portfolio in this terrible market
Omg the stock market has fallen from a high of STI 3500 during its Peak to the current 3195 now.
No idea when is the bottom. However, my portfolio has remained relatively 'unscathed'.
To recap, this was how my portfolio looks like and I explained briefly here.
The majority of my stocks are Trust & Reits and as they are more stable, they form a good backing for my overall portfolio. I am still gaining a net positive in these Reits and as a result, they mitigated the loss in my blue chip and growth stocks.
My reits stocks: AIMS AMP, Keppel DC
My trusts stocks: Capitamall (waiting for a better price to sell), FrasersCentre point trust
My blue chip stocks: Keppel, StarHub, Raffles Medical
My growth stocks: Q&M, Amtek Engineering, Hyflux, Alibaba
Sigh. If only entire portfolio is made up of Reits right? Yeah.. during a downturn, I think that way. But when it is bullish, things go the opposite way and I contemplate why I didn't buy more growth stocks. (lol)
Reits, bullish or bearish, they are relatively stable.
No idea when is the bottom. However, my portfolio has remained relatively 'unscathed'.
To recap, this was how my portfolio looks like and I explained briefly here.
The majority of my stocks are Trust & Reits and as they are more stable, they form a good backing for my overall portfolio. I am still gaining a net positive in these Reits and as a result, they mitigated the loss in my blue chip and growth stocks.
My reits stocks: AIMS AMP, Keppel DC
My trusts stocks: Capitamall (waiting for a better price to sell), FrasersCentre point trust
My blue chip stocks: Keppel, StarHub, Raffles Medical
My growth stocks: Q&M, Amtek Engineering, Hyflux, Alibaba
Sigh. If only entire portfolio is made up of Reits right? Yeah.. during a downturn, I think that way. But when it is bullish, things go the opposite way and I contemplate why I didn't buy more growth stocks. (lol)
Reits, bullish or bearish, they are relatively stable.
Thursday, 9 July 2015
Ezra Review- What's wrong with this company??
The very 'hot' stock recently is Ezra. Not that it is bulling in hotness, but boiling in danger and facing so much uncertainty that it is so hot. Someone very close to me is vested in it and is very troubled, so here I am, trying to offer a little advice.
Today's financial results- 10th July was released.
Oh my.. So many things that I conclude (purely based on my very humble thoughts, may not be factual so pls don't send me a lawyer's letter)
Pls read this with discretion and kindly note these are just what I THINK*
1. Company seems to show that they do not know how to control expenses
Revenue dropped by 3%. By right when revenue drops, one should see a drop in Expenses such as income/administrative. However, for Ezra, their expenses increased by so much.
Wow, cannot cut pay of high mgmt.? don't wish to retrench people? cannot control expenses? MNCs will come out with drastic cost cutting measures, including cutting high salaries of top mgmt. and board wide retrenchment. I don't see it in Ezra.
If it needs to be done, it has to be.
Which leads me to the next point.
2. Operating profit dropped 81%
Erm. That's like so close to having a negative profit already. The company still tried to sugar coat the announcement that their revenue maintained despite such challenging environment.
Pls open your eyes big big and look at the financial statements.
3. Offering rights to repay perpetual securities
I *think* this means that the company might be unable to pay off their debts, so they have to offer rights to raise money.
Not that they are raising money to fund growth. They are using it to pay their perpetual securities and bonds!
Which means.. more debt?
Conclusion: My advice
1. If you are not vested: Good for you, pls do not buy. Wait until the Saudi Arabia and the shale oil producers in USA have worked out a win win situation for the oil price to start climbing up. Otherwise, oil price is likely to remain low for a few years more.
2. If you are vested:
1. Have you bought the rights?
If yes: If you bought the rights at $0.1, you should sell it when trading commence, of course at a higher price.
If no: wait and observe today's price, since you have a week more to buy the rights.
Today's financial results- 10th July was released.
Oh my.. So many things that I conclude (purely based on my very humble thoughts, may not be factual so pls don't send me a lawyer's letter)
Pls read this with discretion and kindly note these are just what I THINK*
1. Company seems to show that they do not know how to control expenses
Revenue dropped by 3%. By right when revenue drops, one should see a drop in Expenses such as income/administrative. However, for Ezra, their expenses increased by so much.
Wow, cannot cut pay of high mgmt.? don't wish to retrench people? cannot control expenses? MNCs will come out with drastic cost cutting measures, including cutting high salaries of top mgmt. and board wide retrenchment. I don't see it in Ezra.
If it needs to be done, it has to be.
Which leads me to the next point.
2. Operating profit dropped 81%
Erm. That's like so close to having a negative profit already. The company still tried to sugar coat the announcement that their revenue maintained despite such challenging environment.
Pls open your eyes big big and look at the financial statements.
3. Offering rights to repay perpetual securities
I *think* this means that the company might be unable to pay off their debts, so they have to offer rights to raise money.
Not that they are raising money to fund growth. They are using it to pay their perpetual securities and bonds!
Which means.. more debt?
Conclusion: My advice
1. If you are not vested: Good for you, pls do not buy. Wait until the Saudi Arabia and the shale oil producers in USA have worked out a win win situation for the oil price to start climbing up. Otherwise, oil price is likely to remain low for a few years more.
2. If you are vested:
1. Have you bought the rights?
If yes: If you bought the rights at $0.1, you should sell it when trading commence, of course at a higher price.
If no: wait and observe today's price, since you have a week more to buy the rights.
Sunday, 5 July 2015
Understanding stock price support levels of Starhub & M1
Hello,
In my previous blog post here about how StarHub was such a good buy on 29th June at $3.70, I received a comment that M1 trading at $3.23 now might be a good buy too even though I have missed SH's boat.
However, I would like to explain in detail about the concept of price support levels and how it is important in investing.
1. What is 'Support' and 'Resistance' in stock price?
Pls see figure 1.
As quoted from Investopedia, "Support is the price level through which a stock or market seldom falls (illustrated by the blue arrows). Resistance, on the other hand, is the price level that a stock or market seldom surpasses (illustrated by the red arrows)."
2. Therefore, one should buy at Support level and sell at Resistance!
3. Why StarHub was a better buy than M1 at $3.70
In my previous blog post here about how StarHub was such a good buy on 29th June at $3.70, I received a comment that M1 trading at $3.23 now might be a good buy too even though I have missed SH's boat.
However, I would like to explain in detail about the concept of price support levels and how it is important in investing.
1. What is 'Support' and 'Resistance' in stock price?
Pls see figure 1.
As quoted from Investopedia, "Support is the price level through which a stock or market seldom falls (illustrated by the blue arrows). Resistance, on the other hand, is the price level that a stock or market seldom surpasses (illustrated by the red arrows)."
2. Therefore, one should buy at Support level and sell at Resistance!
3. Why StarHub was a better buy than M1 at $3.70
SH price support level since 2014 was at $4.00. At $3.70, it has broken the price support level and it is a rarity to drop by 7.5% of this support level on 29 June.
On the other hand, M1 at $3.23 (current price now), this price support level was already broken through in June, before the greekexit crisis. On 29 June, M1 reached its lowest at $3.16, a drop of only 1.85% of its support level. At this price level, there is no 'rarity' in its pricing.
4. Time value of money
If I had bought SH at $3.70, it was as good as buying the same stock in June 2013, this was the selling price 2 years ago.
However, at $3.23 for M1 now, it is only as good as buying this stock in Jan 2014.
If both were to maintain the same earnings as compared to previous years, by 'time travelling' to the stock price of SH 2 years ago, it is a much better buy.
Conclusion:
Understanding Price support and resistance levels is useful when discerning when to buy and sell.
Market sentiments seem to regard SH as a better stock due to its stronger price support levels, although M1's financials might be better.
Wednesday, 1 July 2015
StarHub- Missed the boat
So.. SH was trading at $3.70 on Monday, finally breaking through the $4.00 which it had strongly held on for the past year. Monday (29 June) was the day when major stocks experienced a terrible diarrhea.
I was contemplating so hard whether to buy as it seemed to go free fall and with so much uncertainty over the Greek bailout.
Anyway, fast forward three days later, major stocks have slightly rebounded.
At $3.94, I can't exactly say that SH is trading at a good value as it has too much debt. However, I notice that it has better resistance than M1 when the latter fares better in its financials instead.
Missed the boat. No idea when I can take such a good chance again. Arrrgh.
I was contemplating so hard whether to buy as it seemed to go free fall and with so much uncertainty over the Greek bailout.
Anyway, fast forward three days later, major stocks have slightly rebounded.
At $3.94, I can't exactly say that SH is trading at a good value as it has too much debt. However, I notice that it has better resistance than M1 when the latter fares better in its financials instead.
Missed the boat. No idea when I can take such a good chance again. Arrrgh.
Friday, 5 June 2015
Pre-IPO stock options- Scam anot?
Sigh.. Recently, my friend told me that he bought a Pre-IPO stock in Singapore and he is convinced by the person talking in the seminar that he can earn a few times over. He says he trusts his friend who took him in and the institution.
Wow. seriously amazing. That's like 200%? 300%? 400%?
Meanwhile, these are the average returns of all other investments:
0.025% savings account
1.3% 1-year FD
3.25% OCBC 360 Account
7.8% S&P 500
15% Warren Buffet
Gua gua....
I have no idea what this Pre-IPO is about, what the seminar is about, who the person selling is so I can't say anything much.
BUT
1. Are you worth millions?
Sorry, if you are not worth millions I don't think you can get a pie of the Pre-IPO stock. Pre-IPOs are normally allocated to investment banks who are the underwriters and have lots of money. Unless you are the favorites of the investment banks (which means you are very very rich), you would perhaps be given a pie. Most people don't even have the connection to these investment banks.
2. Unpopular stock
I think it is very laughable when a company needs to set up a seminar to convince people to buy its Pre-IPO shares. Lol can you imagine Alibaba doing that last time? Do they need to? Or Facebook or twitter doing that? If they need to set up a seminar to convince people to buy, then sorry, it is probably a very lousy stock.
3. Too good to be true
High risk comes with high returns. Most investment vehicles can only have the average returns of at most 8% or a little higher if you are very good at it. It is very difficult and very unlikely to have abnormal returns consistently, like seriously can people use their brains to think????
Sigh. There have been so many investment scams being reported but why do people keeping falling and falling for them over and over again?
4. IPO may never materialize
There is no guarantee that the company will make it to the actual IPO or the actual price.
That's my input for this Pre-IPO don't know scam or not scam. I say, please, if you do not know what to invest or how to invest, I think it will be better if you just put your $ inside the ocbc 360 account.
Meanwhile, if any readers knows about this Pre-IPO thing, do enlighten me.
Thank you~
Tuesday, 26 May 2015
Starhub Stock Review (II)
I previously blogged that Starhub (SH) was trading at an insane price of $4.43 (here) and that was overvalued. I have sold off SH at $4.39 and it didn't surprise me that it is now trading at $4.02, near to its 52 week low.
The big drop came about after SH announced that its profit from operations has decreased by 15% when compared to 1Q2014. EBITDA was also 8.5% lower for the quarter.
With my analysis of $4.04 a share, P/E is 19.95 times. SingTel's P/E is 18.5 and M1's 18.48. This might mean that at this current share price, it is not exactly an attractive stock to buy. The D/E is 4.63 (really high) whereas the other 2 telcos are 0.37/0.56 respectively.
The PEG ratio is also high as compared to other Telcos. :(
I think the only saving grace is still its attractive dividend payout. But I wouldn't risk buying the stock and then half a year later, see a drop in price value again. End up my net return would still be the same or even worse.
Technical jargons aside, I wouldn't buy this stock yet. Not now.
The big drop came about after SH announced that its profit from operations has decreased by 15% when compared to 1Q2014. EBITDA was also 8.5% lower for the quarter.
With my analysis of $4.04 a share, P/E is 19.95 times. SingTel's P/E is 18.5 and M1's 18.48. This might mean that at this current share price, it is not exactly an attractive stock to buy. The D/E is 4.63 (really high) whereas the other 2 telcos are 0.37/0.56 respectively.
The PEG ratio is also high as compared to other Telcos. :(
I think the only saving grace is still its attractive dividend payout. But I wouldn't risk buying the stock and then half a year later, see a drop in price value again. End up my net return would still be the same or even worse.
Technical jargons aside, I wouldn't buy this stock yet. Not now.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)